Re: [Chicken-users] Constant for maximum number of arguments?

[felix winkelmann]

Yes, I'll try to improve this.


cheers,
felix

On 4/24/06, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>
> > Make that 120 - it doesn't matter really (but I'll fix the docs :-).
>
> BTW, I think that the sections "Deviations from the standard" and
> "Bugs and limitations" should either be merged or cross-reference
> one another.  It's not obvious to me why some things are in one
> and others are in the other: surely the stuff about not obeying
> read-write invariance is a bug and/or a limitation?
>
> --
> You're a brave man! Go and break through the            John Cowan
> lines, and remember while you're out there              address@hidden
> risking life and limb through shot and shell,           http://ccil.org/~cowan
> we'll be in here thinking what a sucker you are!
>         --Rufus T. Firefly
>