[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: packrat example

From: felix winkelmann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: packrat example
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 09:52:33 +0100

On 04 Dec 2006 00:28:39 +0100, Thomas Hafner <address@hidden> >
That's sufficient for the original example. But as soon as I played
around with my own first grammar, I had to add also:
(require-extension srfi-1)

It's obviously needed by the packrat egg. Shouldn't srfi-1 then be
provided automatically by just using the packrat egg?

It normally should. If you run csi (or a compiled program that uses
packrat) with "-:d", what is the output?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]