[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spiffy patch attempt (was Re: [Chicken-users] Minor issue with spiff
Re: spiffy patch attempt (was Re: [Chicken-users] Minor issue with spiffy's sxml->html)
Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:03:01 -0500
Peter Wright scripsit:
> Hence my following attempt at a patch for the latest spiffy-base.scm
> which also incorporates (steals? :)) the sxml-transforms special
> handling for (a) inline tags, and (b) certain tags when they're empty.
A suggestion for all this introduction of newlines: instead of
adding newlines after end-tags and worrying about which ones can
and cannot have a problem with it, why not add a newline *within*
the end-tag, thus: "</b\n>"? That's a general solution and
simplifies the problem greatly.
We call nothing profound address@hidden
that is not wittily expressed. John Cowan
--Northrop Frye (improved)