Re: [Chicken-users] Subversion support misguided IMHO

[Peter Bex]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:17:48AM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
> It doesn't.  Darcs is better than Subversion for the active developer.  
> It has patching features that allow open source developers to work in 
> distributed fashion.  Mercurial is an alternative that has greater 
> platform reach than Darcs, because it's based on Python.  If you're 
> interested in The One True Version Control System, you're welcome to 
> assist us on that, but it's not going to be Subversion.

I don't care about Subversion, but I do care about Darcs, for the stated
reasons.  Bascially, any versioning system that compiles and runs without
hassle on all the systems Chicken compiles and runs on is acceptable, IMHO.

Regards,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth

pgpelDUpi1E1d.pgp
Description: PGP signature