Re: [Chicken-users] url egg

[Kon Lovett]

On Feb 21, 2007, at 3:09 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:

> On 2/21/07, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 2/21/07, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > I think it's a bug:
> > >
> > > % diff url.scm~ url.scm
> > > 222c222
> > > <         (list userinfo host (or (string->number port) port))
> > > ---
> > > >         (list userinfo host (and port (or (string->number  
> > port) port)))
> > > %
> >
> > What's (or (string->number port) port) for?
> > Couldn't it be this?
> >           (list userinfo host (and port (string->number port)))
>
> Yes, right. Sorry, I tend to overlook the obvious.
>
> > > Your url-compat defs look ok, but I haven't got the time for  
> > full testing.
> > > If you think it's safe (and perhaps Kon can say a word or two  
> > about this),
> > > just check your changes in.
> >
> > I'd like to confirm one thing.
> > My idea is to put this code into the url egg,
> > and let uri egg be removed or replaced to simply (use url).
> > Is it OK for you guys?
>
> Yes, that would be ok for me. That we have two eggs about url/uri
> parsing is annyoing.
>
> Kon?

Just url is fine. I would remove the html: stuff altogether from the  
SLIB derived code & place the ftp: stuff (only 1 proc I think) into  
its' own file. So only url related code is in url. Should also decide  
on namespace style. I kept the urc:/uri: prefixs & added '-' versions  
of the symbols. (It was to be a port of SLIB code.) But we only need  
one style, I suggest the '-' style.

> cheers,
> felix
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users