[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!
From: |
Graham Fawcett |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete! |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:23:47 -0500 |
On 3/5/07, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
perversity tends to the maximum.
I see you've been reading my code. ;-)
However I think a '(hash-table-remove! hash-table (-> key value
boolean))' procedure should be added to "extras.scm" just to be
"safe".
Could you please explain that signature? I don't know how to interpret
your (-> ...) form.
Cheers,
Graham
- [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Graham Fawcett, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Zbigniew, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Kon Lovett, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Graham Fawcett, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Kon Lovett, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!,
Graham Fawcett <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Kon Lovett, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Graham Fawcett, 2007/03/05
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Kon Lovett, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Graham Fawcett, 2007/03/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2007/03/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, aLejandro fOrero cUervo, 2007/03/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Graham Fawcett, 2007/03/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete!, Zbigniew, 2007/03/05