|
| From: | felix winkelmann |
| Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Number representation question |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:25:49 +0200 |
On 6/5/07, Peter Keller <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello, According to the R5RS spec, I should be able to write a number like this: .3###e-5 However, chicken rejects this with the numbers egg and determines it is an unbound variable. What's up? (I realize the mathematical simplification of it, but that isn't the point, I think it should be recognized by the lexer and it isn't).
Yeah, one of the many holes in the R5RS support. You could do me a favour and write a trac ticket for this (http://trac.callcc.org). But R5RS numbers syntax is somewhat overcomplicated, you must admit... cheers, felix
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |