[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question
From: |
Zbigniew |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:59:36 -0500 |
On 9/24/07, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:29:25PM -0400, William Ramsay wrote:
> > Just calling it produces r.
> Yes, this is (afaik) a deviation from the standard. ... I want
> an error if I forgot to receive all values, I don't want the first
> value
This behaviour was changed for user convenience just before Chicken
2.0. The backstory is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2005-05/msg00042.html
FYI, this behaviour is not a deviation from the standard, per se. R5RS says:
"The effect of passing no value or more than one value to
continuations that were not created by call-with-values is
unspecified."
So, implementations are free to error out, or to return a single value
in the style of Common Lisp.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, Graham Fawcett, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, William Ramsay, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, Peter Bex, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, Alex Queiroz, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, Graham Fawcett, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, John Cowan, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, John Cowan, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, Peter Bex, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, Peter Bex, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question, Graham Fawcett, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Imlib2 question,
Zbigniew <=