Re: [Chicken-users] On parameterize and fluid-let

[Mark Fredrickson]

On 10/15/07, Tobia Conforto <address@hidden> wrote:
> Mark Fredrickson wrote:
> > ... we can see the macro expansion of parameterize using dynamic-wind.
> > Dynamic-wind will call the function g6 before and after control enters
> > or leaves the thunk, by call/cc, the basis of threads in chicken
>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> No, I believe threads are orthogonal to continuations.

I was basing this analysis on a single line of text from the
call/cc.org page. (It comprises my entire understanding of threads in
chicken):

"Lightweight threads based on first-class continuations"

If this does not mean that threads are a implemented as continuations,
what does it mean?

-M