[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:38:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hans Nowak scripsit:
> No real reason, at least not at this moment; I was just trying to get an
> idea of how "introspective" Chicken is. Like, in Python you can get *some*
> information about a defined function (like its signature, bytecode, etc),
> and in languages like Io you can get the actual source.
That wouldn't work too well from compiled code.
--
It was impossible to inveigle John Cowan <address@hidden>
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Into offering the slightest apology
For his Phenomenology. --W. H. Auden, from "People" (1953)
- [Chicken-users] A few questions, Hans Nowak, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] A few questions, Alex Queiroz, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] A few questions, Kon Lovett, 2008/01/29
- [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Hans Nowak, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Kon Lovett, 2008/01/29
- [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Hans Nowak, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Kon Lovett, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, John Cowan, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Elf, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Alex Queiroz, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, David Brown, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Alex Queiroz, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Mark Fredrickson, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Elf, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions, Kon Lovett, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions (oops), Kon Lovett, 2008/01/31