[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code
From: |
Felix Winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:29:57 +0100 (CET) |
From: Ivan Raikov <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:43:52 +0900
>
> Well, users of monadic programming languages would say that
> continuations are monads in disguise :-) And yes, monads are "just"
> statically typed continuations in a side-effect free environment, but
> my point was that implementing them in Chicken would be non-trivial,
> unless you had an elegant way to specify operational semantics.
>
Sorry, I don't understand this. Unless you want lazyness, what would
be required in a suitable general dynamically typed language to
implement monads?
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/07
- [Chicken-users] Re: Chicken MPI, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/08
- [Chicken-users] Re: Chicken MPI, Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, felix winkelmann, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code,
Felix Winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Houman Zolfaghari, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Tobia Conforto, 2008/03/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Leonardo Valeri Manera, 2008/03/07
Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/05