[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] bug in big numbers or somewhere
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] bug in big numbers or somewhere |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:44:04 +0200 |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:30 AM, naruto canada <address@hidden> wrote:
> hi
>
> I thinks there is a bug in big numbers extension or somewhere else...
> I am not sure.
>
>From a quick peek I can infer at least the following: the compiler
does currently not support bignum literals, the large exact
number in "random-parameters" is silently coerced into an
inexact number, so "random" will always return an inexact
result. Replacing "9999..." with (string->number "999...") should
help.
cheers,
felix