[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:22:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:29:57PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
> > We do have the regex-literals egg... Do you propose adding that to
> > core Chicken?
>
> I wasn't proposing adding anything :)
>
> If Chicken switches to irregex, then we can just use SREs
> and be rid of the ugliness of regex syntax forever.
OK, so why are we having this discussion? ;)
It would be sad to see a new feature like this added to Chicken
just to see the cause for its introduction disappear a few
weeks/months later.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgpvKue9gjAeb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Peter Bex, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Peter Bex, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Tobia Conforto, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings,
Peter Bex <=
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/10
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Tobia Conforto, 2008/10/10