[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:59:34 +0100 |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I would keep these things in extensions, though. There is already too much
>> stuff in the core (I know I keep repeating this, but I'm really concerned
>> about
>> it).
>
> I think Ivan is not suggesting _adding_ this to core, but rather
> _replacing_ what we have in core with this. In total, this should
> have the net effect of adding nothing (though I don't know how big
> both libraries are).
The current stuff is relatively minimal, compared to the full filepath
library.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Matthew Welland, 2008/10/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Peter Bex, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Vincent Manis, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Ivan Raikov, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Peter Bex, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Ivan Raikov, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, John Cowan, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, John Cowan, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28