[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 41
From: |
minh thu |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 41 |
Date: |
Thu, 7 May 2009 15:45:12 +0200 |
2009/5/7 Phil Bewig <address@hidden>:
> ...
>>
>> I disagree. Streams and lists are not substitutable. Haskell conflates
>> the two because everything in Haskell is lazy, so there is no difference.
>> But that isn't true in Scheme.
>>
>> There is a reason for 'delay' & 'force'. Scheme is "eager" but
>> "multi-paradigm" and API designers shouldn't go out of the way to hide the
>> fact. At least for the "basics" :-)
>
> Exactly. Haskell is pure and lazy all the way. Scheme is broader.
Hi,
I'm a bit surprised you mention delay and force for Scheme then say
Haskell is pure and lazy "all the way". You can have side effects in
Haskell and you can force evaluation too.
Cheers,
Thu
- Re: [Chicken-users] Which eggs to migrate from Chicken 3 first?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2009/05/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Which eggs to migrate from Chicken 3 first?, Phil Bewig, 2009/05/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] Which eggs to migrate from Chicken 3 first?, Alex Shinn, 2009/05/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] Which eggs to migrate from Chicken 3 first?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2009/05/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] Which eggs to migrate from Chicken 3 first?, Phil Bewig, 2009/05/06
- [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 41, Kon Lovett, 2009/05/07
- [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 41, Phil Bewig, 2009/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 41,
minh thu <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 41, John Cowan, 2009/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 41, Phil Bewig, 2009/05/07
Re: [Chicken-users] Which eggs to migrate from Chicken 3 first?, Alexey Radul, 2009/05/07