[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:17:55 -0700 |
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:30 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Kon Lovett scripsit:
>
> > Possible is adding a int64_t heap type. But involves hitting every
> > piece of code that any extension of the core number system would.
>
> Indeed. If we're going to do that, I'd rather go with core bignums
> after all, perhaps from LibTomMath (which is dedicated to the public
> domain by its author), and dispose of the issue once and for all.
Something like this is surely my preference too.
- Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/10/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums, John Cowan, 2009/10/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums, Kon Lovett, 2009/10/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums, John Cowan, 2009/10/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums, Kon Lovett, 2009/10/02
- [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Kon Lovett, 2009/10/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, John Cowan, 2009/10/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Kon Lovett, 2009/10/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, John Cowan, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, John Cowan, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Ivan Raikov, 2009/10/04