[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] syntax-case and Chicken 4.2.0

From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] syntax-case and Chicken 4.2.0
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:20 -0800

In one sense, this is good news!

A question: does the builtin syntax-rules accept the (... ...) syntax
that Dybvig's system does?  My code has some macros that expand to macro
definitions, the canonical case where nested ... is often necessary.  

(Or, alternatively, does it support some other method to avoid the ...
literal problem in this case?)


On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:19 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Dan Liebgold scripsit:
> > I probably have something obvious wrong, but after installing the
> > syntax-case egg in Chicken 4.2.0 I can't "require" it, and I can't make
> > sense of the error:
> Chicken 4.x doesn't support the syntax-case egg or any other macrology egg.
> It now has built-in macros, and supports only explicit renaming and 
> syntax-rules.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]