Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

Hi

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:38 -0800 "Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray" <address@hidden> 
wrote:

> I was under the impression that the QT egg was more a demo, then an
> egg ment to be practical, and hence was *finished*.

I'm not a Qt expert, but my impression is that when the documentation
for the Qt egg says it's supposed to be incomplete, one of the meanings
is that the egg tends to focus on the Qt features NOT provided by
chicken and any other egg.  A bunch of Qt features are provided by
chicken itself or eggs, so, there's no reason to make bindings for those
features.

Best wishes.
Mario