chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] syntactically completeness / consistency


From: Ivan Shmakov
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] syntactically completeness / consistency
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:49:07 +0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "F" == Felix  <address@hidden> writes:

 F> With the most recent commits (4.4.4), chicken is now consistent in
 F> the way core forms are handled. There are no hard-coded special
 F> forms and everything can be redefined, reexported and modified on
 F> import. Syntax may now also expand into module forms (if at
 F> toplevel, local or nested modules are still not available and not
 F> strictly necessary).

 F> So, the transition to hygienic macros and a real module system is
 F> hereby complete, not taking into account the bugs that will still
 F> lurk everywhere and the low performance of the expander, which will
 F> be worked on.

        While not using Chicken in any way worth speaking of these days,
        I still consider this great news!

 F> Thanks to everybody for putting up with the disruptive and painful
 F> migration work and for all the help.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]