[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:30:43 +0200 (CEST) |
From: Arthur Maciel <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:30:59 -0300
> Hum... to understand it a little more: why protobj instead of TinyCLOS or
> coops?
It's simple and leightweight. And coops didn't exist when the qt egg
was written.
> PS.: Tell me if I'm being boring about intense questioning.
>
Hey, you're welcome to ask.
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Felix, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Arthur Maciel, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Sean D'Epagnier, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Felix, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Martin DeMello, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Arthur Maciel, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Martin DeMello, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Felix, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Andrei Barbu, 2010/08/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it, Peter Bex, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it,
Felix <=