[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:40:19 -0600 |
We've been over this a few times and haven't found a reliable solution, mainly
because no devs have 10.6. The issue is not the kernel but the default output
format of gcc itself. If anyone has a reliable way to determine that for all
10.6 installs, and which still works for all 10.4 and 10.5, please let us know.
Undoubtedly some project has gotten this right.
Barring that, you have to manually set ARCH on 10.6.
Jim
On Dec 1, 2010, at 7:31, Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Stephen Eilert <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault
> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:50:59 -0300
>
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:51 AM, David Dreisigmeyer
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> You can do this to default to 64-bit, versus 32-bit:
>>>
>>> http://www.overclock.net/mac/564147-how-enable-64-bit-default-os.html
>>
>> Does it help with this specific issue?
>>
>> Even with a 32-bit kernel (and extensions), OSX will run 64bit
>> applications just fine.
>>
>> Furthermore, some machines cannot enable the 64-bit kernel (my White
>> Macbook doesn't seem to be able to, for instance).
>
> What we need is a way to determine the correct ARCH settings via
> shell commands, so that the makefile can take care of this.
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Felix, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Alan Post, 2010/12/01
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Stephen Eilert, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Felix, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, David Dreisigmeyer, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Thomas Chust, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault,
Jim Ursetto <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, John Cowan, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: seg fault, David Dreisigmeyer, 2010/12/01