[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] llvm-gcc / clang

From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] llvm-gcc / clang
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:35:21 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Felix scripsit:

> Oh, and clang gave me stupid warnings that where actually wrong
> (an "x == x" comparison of floats to detect NaN, which is IMHO
> totally correct, triggers a warning - but I'm sure John can give
> us the correct interpretation of the standard C semantics).

ISO C doesn't require support for NaNs.

John Cowan      address@hidden
Statistics don't help a great deal in making important decisions.
Most people have more than the average number of feet, but I'm not about
to start a company selling shoes in threes. --Ross Gardler

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]