Re: [Chicken-users] llvm-gcc / clang

[John Cowan]

Felix scripsit:

> Oh, and clang gave me stupid warnings that where actually wrong
> (an "x == x" comparison of floats to detect NaN, which is IMHO
> totally correct, triggers a warning - but I'm sure John can give
> us the correct interpretation of the standard C semantics).

ISO C doesn't require support for NaNs.

-- 
John Cowan      address@hidden         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Statistics don't help a great deal in making important decisions.
Most people have more than the average number of feet, but I'm not about
to start a company selling shoes in threes. --Ross Gardler