[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:48:16 +0100 |
Am Samstag, den 04.12.2010, 14:56 +0100 schrieb Felix:
> >> > (define (cons x y)
> >> > (define (dispatch m)
> >> > (cond ((= m 0) x)
> >> > ((= m 1) y)
> >> > (else (error "Argument not 0 or 1 -- CONS" m))))
> >> > dispatch)
...
Error happens here in csi already.
> ... depending on how `caar' was called here. David, what expression
> did you enter?
caar never called, except - probably - in evaluation of (define
(cons ...
- [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, David Steiner, 2010/12/03
- [Chicken-users] Re: redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, David Steiner, 2010/12/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Kon Lovett, 2010/12/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Hans Nowak, 2010/12/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, F. Wittenberger, 2010/12/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Felix, 2010/12/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP,
F. Wittenberger <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/03