[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow"

From: F. Wittenberger
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow"
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:59:01 +0100

Am Sonntag, den 05.12.2010, 16:15 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
> Should `equal?' descend into procedures, or just do an `eq?' test?
> R5RS only requires a structural equivalence test for pairs and
> vectors, but being able to contain (say) records is something that's
> too handy not to have.
> Would the language lawyers please step forward and comment?
At least it would break some of my code, if I could not do the

(define (a x) x)
(define (b x) x)

and have

(equal? (list 'a a) (list 'a b))

return #f

Though this might be ruled out by RxRS, is it?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]