[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow"
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow" |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:08:32 +0100 |
Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 08:46 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
> I selected equal? in this case because the *lists* aren't going to
> be pointer-equal, just their contents, and the contents fall into
> two distinct classes, procedures and strings, and the strings won't
> be eq? for the same reason the lists aren't.
>
Just an idea (which is probably a bad one, if your strings come from
dynamic input as opposed to local, static data like grammars or alike):
Feed the strings through string->symbol.
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Mario Domenech Goulart, 2010/12/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Alan Post, 2010/12/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Felix, 2010/12/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Alan Post, 2010/12/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Felix, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", F. Wittenberger, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Alan Post, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", F. Wittenberger, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Alan Post, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", John Cowan, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow",
F. Wittenberger <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Alan Post, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] jbogenturfa'i: "Error: stack overflow", Felix, 2010/12/06