Re: [Chicken-users] return value of test

[Alan Post]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:04:45AM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Currently in the test egg, the return value of
> 
>   (test name expect expr)
> 
> is the status of the test.  Is anyone making use
> of this?  It's been pointed out that it would be
> much more useful to return the result of expr,
> so that you could do
> 
>   (define x (test ...))
> 
> and similar.
> 

I'm not using the return value of any of my tests.  This would be
an easy change to test: make the change, run salmonella, and count
how many things broke.  If the count is small, keep the change.  :-)

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi