[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] coops
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] coops |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:20:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Dear Sandro,
* address@hidden <address@hidden> [110119 03:09]:
> Is there a reason why <pair> is a subclass of <list>?
This reflects the way scheme sees lists, which are build of pairs:
(equal? (cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 (cons 4 (cons 5 '())))))
(list 1 2 3 4 5))
=> #t
Does this help?
Christian
- [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 2011/01/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Felix, 2011/01/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 2011/01/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops,
Christian Kellermann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Thomas Chust, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Christian Kellermann, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Felix, 2011/01/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, John Cowan, 2011/01/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Thomas Chust, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Felix, 2011/01/25