Re: [Chicken-users] Using a macro definition within a explicit renaming macro.

[Patrick Li]

Thanks for the help.

The module workaround will work fine for what I'm doing! 

  -Patrick

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Felix <address@hidden> wrote:

>
> There may be a shorter way involving begin-for-syntax or something.
>

(begin-for-syntax (define-syntax ...)) should actually work, but it
doesn't. I have to investigate this.


cheers,
felix