Re: [Chicken-users] amb-extras: distinct? expects srfi-1 member

[John Cowan]

Markus Klotzbuecher scripsit:

> distinct? from amb-extras fails with an "bad argument count" error
> when srfi-1 is not loaded. In that case the member procedure from
> 'scheme' and not srfi-1 is used, which doesn't take a additional
> equality procedure as used by distinct?.

In the R7RS small language (which is intended as a successor to R5RS),
member will have three arguments:  see http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/ticket/42 .

-- 
John Cowan  address@hidden  http://ccil.org/~cowan
Linguistics is arguably the most hotly contested property in the academic
realm. It is soaked with the blood of poets, theologians, philosophers,
philologists, psychologists, biologists and neurologists, along with
whatever blood can be got out of grammarians. - Russ Rymer