Re: [Chicken-users] amb-extras: distinct? expects srfi-1 member

[Alex Shinn]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:21 AM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Markus Klotzbuecher scripsit:
>
>> distinct? from amb-extras fails with an "bad argument count" error
>> when srfi-1 is not loaded. In that case the member procedure from
>> 'scheme' and not srfi-1 is used, which doesn't take a additional
>> equality procedure as used by distinct?.
>
> In the R7RS small language (which is intended as a successor to R5RS),
> member will have three arguments:  see http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/ticket/42 .

To clarify, the third argument is optional - i.e. the standard
`member' in R7RS is the same as in SRFI-1.

-- 
Alex