[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with rationals
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with rationals |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:27:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:20:40PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> You do get a warning about coercion to flonum from (rational? 6/10),
> but you also get the right answer, namely #t.
Right, that *should* be the answer.
> BTW, I think you should go ahead and release the trunk numbers egg.
> It surely has fewer bugs than the current release, even if it's not
> Practically Perfect In Every Way.
It's pending one patch to Chicken core currently on -hackers. Depending
on which way this goes it needs a change in numbers to make it consistent.
After that, yes there can be a release.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with rationals, Thomas Chust, 2012/04/09