[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] ANN: Binding for libsdl-mixer available

From: Moritz Heidkamp
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] ANN: Binding for libsdl-mixer available
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:46:40 +0200

Christian Kellermann <address@hidden> writes:
>> A question regarding the API: Is the "music" term inherited from SDL?
> Yes.

OK, best to keep it this way then.

>> And what's the difference to "sample"? Looks like the "music" functions
>> play samples asynchronously. If so I'd vote for renaming it (to
> Both play asynchronously. Samples are mixed together in
> channels. Output is always the channels plus 1 music channel.

I see, thanks for the clarification!

>> something like play-sample/async, only better) since music isn't
>> necessarily the only thing one would want to play in background :-)
> I think the /async is redundant...

Right, if both are asynchronous it is. That suggestion was under the
assumption that play-sample was synchronous. Then all is well :-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]