[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug)
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug) |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:13:47 -0600 |
On Feb 4, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Felix wrote:
>
> Perhaps, but I really don't see a problem of allowing a limit
> on heap allocation in the runtime system.
I think a segfault is an appropriate response to OOM, but I wonder
if it's possible to panic() instead if the heap size can't be increased
as needed.
I also wonder why csi hangs at 100% CPU instead of segfaulting.
Seems like a further indication that panic() should be used.
Currently a panic() is done if heap size is fixed, but not
if it hits the max -- fixed is probably a special case of max,
but I haven't looked very closely.
Jim
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Felix, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Peter Bex, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), John Cowan, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Felix, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Peter Bex, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), John Cowan, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Felix, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug),
Jim Ursetto <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures, Arthur Maciel, 2013/02/02
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures, Arthur Maciel, 2013/02/02