[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses"
From: |
Moritz Heidkamp |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses" |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:17:30 +0100 |
Jörg F. Wittenberger <address@hidden> writes:
> (declare (unit foo)
> ;; this are my uses declarations
> (uses bar foobar library)
> ;; end of uses declarations
> )
>
> (module
> foo *
> ;; this is my import list:
> (import bar foobar library)
> ;; end of import list
> )
Ah, alright, try to drop the `declare' and replace `import' with `use'
except for `chicken', `scheme' and `foreign' as well as all modules /
units from which you only want to import syntax (although using `use'
here has the same effect if all the module exports is syntax anyway).
So your example would probably become something like this:
(module foo *
(import chicken scheme)
(use bar foobar library)
)
Moritz
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Peter Bex, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Peter Bex, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Peter Bex, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/25
Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/24