[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] dynamic scoping

From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] dynamic scoping
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:19:06 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Kon Lovett scripsit:

> Sadly, John Cowan's fine table of SRFI support by implementation
> doesn't cover SRFI 15.

When I did it, I wasn't dealing with withdrawn SRFIs.  As I just said,
fluid-let's definition is highly portable in a single-threaded context.

> In practice real dynamic variables - parameters - are the way to go
> for library or other distributed code. & they are in R7RS!

Yes, indeed.  Also unlike fluid-let, parameters are first class objects.

With techies, I've generally found              John Cowan
If your arguments lose the first round
    Make it rhyme, make it scan                 address@hidden
    Then you generally can
Make the same stupid point seem profound!           --Jonathan Robie

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]