[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] representation of a procedure

From: Kon Lovett
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] representation of a procedure
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:45:25 -0700

On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:52 AM, "Daniel Ajoy" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi,
> Is there a function that gives the content of a procedure (it's definition)?

The interpreter doesn't save the original s-expr & neither does the compiler. 
Reflection facilities are slim.

You can recover, sometimes, the expected argument list. See:

> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]