Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw

[John Cowan]

Michele La Monaca scripsit:

> Mingw
> #;1> (print 1.0 "\n" 2.0 "\n" 3.10)
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.1

It's a deviation but not a bug.  Except for the four cases of
+inf.0, -inf.0, +nan.0, and -0.0, Chicken uses the local C's idea of
number-to-string conversion.  Since "1." is a valid Scheme inexact number,
that's perfectly fine.

-- 
How they ever reached any conclusion at all     <address@hidden>
is starkly unknowable to the human mind.        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett