[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken

From: Daniel Leslie
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:33:12 -0800

That lays the type safety burden upon the developer at run time and not the compiler.

On 28 Nov 2013 10:18, "Moritz Heidkamp" <address@hidden> wrote:
Daniel Leslie <address@hidden> writes:

> Go also enjoys a rather robust Channels system, which is sort of like
> Scheme's ports, only it's type-safe by design.

How are Scheme ports not type-safe? The main difference is that Scheme
ports are limited to just a single type (i.e. characters) but that
doesn't make them type-unsafe, no? :-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]