[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Wiki design

From: Arthur Maciel
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Wiki design
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:54:03 -0200

Thank you for your feedback, Christian and Daniel!

I tried to adjust the code according to your suggestions and made other modifications too. No doubt it is still hacky, but the point now is to gather opinions about this possibility (and others too).

For those who would like to see the last bundle here is the link:

Best wishes,

2013/12/18 Daniel Beecham <address@hidden>
I love it!

Perhaps .definition-record could have a slightly larger padding to make the titles more prominent? 0.5 ems instead of 0.3?
Perhaps the title could also be indented just a smidge; .definition { padding: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 1em }; ?

I'm just spawning ideas here, it looks good either way to me. Great work.

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Christian Kellermann <address@hidden> wrote:
* Arthur Maciel <address@hidden> [131218 08:43]:
> Dear chickeneers,
> I messed up a bit with the wiki design and below is a link to a sketch.
> The packages should be extracted and "new_wiki.html" should be opened in a
> browser. The file "old_wiki.html" goes for comparison with the actual
> design.
> This involved a good deal of hackery, but my focus was on presentation - I
> could fix it if intended to be used. I changed the css, but also the html
> file. So if someone likes it, we would need to change the wiki in order to
> produce a little bit different html from its default syntax.
> Beyond the design itself I could also redefine numbered lists so now
> sublists start counting from their parents number (ex.: 1, 2, 3, 3.1, 3.2,
> 4, 5, etc.).
> The changes were based on the wiki page of an egg I intend to release soon.
> I'm not sure if the changes apply to all wiki pages.
> I hope you like it. If you don't, please let me know how I could do a
> better job! Thanks in advance!

I have to say, I like it! Thanks for the suggestion! What do the
others think?

In the end I would like to get rid of the reference to googlefonts
and the googleusercontent stuff. If it is by the chicken project,
it should be served off the browser. All these newfangled CDN tricks
these days...

Kind regards,


In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than
water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can
surpass it. --- Lao Tzu

Chicken-users mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]