[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale?
From: |
Evan Hanson |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 May 2014 13:12:16 -0700 |
User-agent: |
OpenSMTPD enqueuer (Demoosh) |
On 2014-05-07 12:01, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
> However for the case at hand I'd even love a notation which allows
> to attach a custom message to the deprecated "type". Possibly like
> this:
I agree, an annotation for deprecation warnings would be valuable.
Currently, it's totally on the user to go figure out why something's
been deprecated and what to do about it; it would be nice to be able to
include even something as simple as "bar is deprecated, use baz instead"
in the warnings.
Evan
- [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale?, Michele La Monaca, 2014/05/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale?, Michele La Monaca, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale?, John Cowan, 2014/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale?, Michele La Monaca, 2014/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale?, John Cowan, 2014/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] utc-time->seconds and local-time->seconds rationale?, Michele La Monaca, 2014/05/07