|Subject:||Re: [Chicken-users] bug update-uri in uri-common|
|Date:||Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:19:43 +0200|
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 02:19:22PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:I have now implemented c), and tagged release 1.4. Please give it a try!
> So here's a new poll:
> a) The current behaviour of resetting port to #f if it's the default port
> for this scheme is ok.
> b) The port should not be reset, and the uri should be printed with an
> explicit port, even if it's the default for this scheme.
> c) The port should not be reset, but the uri should be printed without
> port if it's the default for this scheme.
Kris, thanks for reporting this problem. Thanks Andy, John and Evan
for supplying valuable feedback. Doing the right thing was tricky here.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|