|
From: | Alex Shinn |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] UTF-8 support in eggs |
Date: | Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:22:29 +0900 |
I would say that UTF-8 has *more* chance of causing undetected
> The same approaches also apply to eggs needing the full
> numeric tower, though with UTF-8 there's less chance of
> breakage when mixing eggs which do and don't use the utf8 egg.
breakage, because UTF-8 strings have an interpretation as core
strings, whereas bignums, ratnums, compnums etc. don't look
like numbers to the core, and errors will be thrown.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |