[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] A question about library search order

From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] A question about library search order
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 19:10:20 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Oleg Kolosov scripsit:

> When writing multi-module application I've found that Chicken searches
> for extensions in repository only and import libraries in the supplied
> include-path's additionally. Judging from the sources, this behaviour is
> intentional. Doesn't it make more sense to always search in user
> supplied include paths first, and the repository path last, similar to
> how C compilers search <> includes?

I agree that that would be better.  What was the reason for searching
the repository first?

John Cowan        address@hidden
Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML Infoset, as long as it has
a door sticker saying "No information items inside".  --Eve Maler

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]