[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] actors, roles and meta-observers
From: |
chi |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] actors, roles and meta-observers |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jun 2015 21:39:28 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
Now I'm wondering if lazy lists might not be the answer. I need the top weighted
actor for a role, but sometimes I need the second top one, if the top one fails
further tests along down the road. Or the third top, etc, sounds like a lazy
list to me. My weird db ideas are structured like lazy lists anyway. I probably
throw a bunch of lazy/force/delay constructs in there, and it's suddenly
intuitive, functional, and simple and then I go yell at the Haskell devs to fix
their language so it isn't unpacking 900 megabytes just to compile stuff on
someone's computer. (to compare, glibc/gcc is like 130 megabytes, plus the 15 or
so for chicken)