[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] address@hidden: More SRFI reviewers needed.]

From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] address@hidden: More SRFI reviewers needed.]
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 20:31:58 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Jeremy Steward scripsit:

> Nonetheless, I noticed that the SRFI document mentions implementing
> lazy sequences in a different way (utilizing SRFI 121: Generators,
> which is also on your list). I was wondering if the lazy-seq egg has
> been brought up whatsoever regarding this SRFI, and if there's some
> difference I'm not seeing here. 

As best I can tell, the lazy-seq egg is more like SRFI 41 than like
SRFI 127.  I'm considering turning it into a SRFI to serve as a possible
alternative to SRFI 41 and/or 127.

John Cowan        address@hidden
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]