[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] A question regarding "hidden" eggs

From: Christian Kellermann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] A question regarding "hidden" eggs
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:13:20 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

* Jörg F. Wittenberger <address@hidden> [160116 19:35]:
> Hi,
> I feel the need to have some space to stash away temporary glue code.

Is this about code you want to be able to chicken-install but noone
else should see it?

> Ideally the current version of it is always empty and not of interest to
> anyone.  As documentation always lags behind, it is empty with high
> probability.  However development is not ideal.

I don't understand this.

> Not listing as in being marked as "(hidden)" in the meta file is
> apparently what I want.

That does not make sense to me, if people can install it but should
not use it, what is it good for?

If it is some code that your published eggs rely on, it will be public
in a way. Listing it in an egg index or hide it then does not make a
lot of a difference to me.

But maybe I misunderstand what you really want to get done.



May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you be free from
suffering, and may you live with ease.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]