chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 2 available


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 2 available
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:37:22 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:20:08PM +1200, querent wrote:
> Better late than never?

Absolutely!

>    Operating system: android 7.0
>    Hardware platform: aarch64
>    C Compiler: gcc 7.3.0
>    Installation works?: no
>    Tests work?: N/A
>    Installation of eggs works?: N/A
>    I was following Alexander Shendl's instructions to build in termux
>    (chicken 4.12, but I thought it might work for 5.0.0 too, perhaps
>    mistakenly) and this is what I get:
>    $ TMPDIR=$HOME/tmp make C_COMPILER=clang PREFIX=$HOME/chickens/5.0.0
>    PLATFORM=android install
>    [all the echoing snipped]
>    clang -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -DHAVE_CHICKEN_CONFIG_H
>    -DC_ENABLE_PTABLES -c -Os -fomit-frame-pointer  -DC_BUILDING_LIBCHICKEN
>    library.c -o library-static.o -I. -I./
>    chicken  eval.scm -optimize-level 2 -include-path . -include-path ./
>    -inline -ignore-repository -feature chicken-bootstrap -no-warnings
>    -specialize -consult-types-file ./types.db  -explicit-use -no-trace
>    -output-file eval.c \
>    -emit-import-library chicken.eval \
>    -emit-import-library chicken.load
>    make: chicken: Command not found
>    make: *** [rules.make:788: eval.c] Error 127
>    perhaps there's something I'm not doing right here?

Could you check the timestamp of eval.c is newer than all of the
following Scheme files?

- eval.scm
- chicken.blob.import.scm
- chicken.condition.import.scm
- chicken.foreign.import.scm
- chicken.internal.import.scm
- chicken.keyword.import.scm
- chicken.platform.import.scm

Please check them after untarring and after the failed build.  Maybe
something is touching those files.  Also, did you untar on the device,
or copy the files?  If the latter, you'd have to copy with preservation
of time stamps.

Cheers,
Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]