|
From: | ipcore |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk |
Date: | Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:09:23 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 |
Ok, you've convinced me ;)Github repo is updated with history and old releases, so all cases should be covered now. I've also included the html documentation, as suggested by Vasilij.
Best wishes, -Heinz
On 2/26/19 3:59 PM, John Cowan wrote: >> From my viewpoint, it's not so much about preserving history (though
that's
a Good Thing if you can get it cheaply, which you can), but avoiding two separate repos for C4 and C5. That can only be a maintenance headache, with porting patches to the mainline of the code from C5 to C4 (or vice versa).On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM <address@hidden> wrote: Hello John, I considered doing this, but decided it would be a good idea to start with a clean slate. Wasn't 100% sure though, that's why I explicitly mentioned it. If the general opinion is that history from SVN should be preserved, then I'll do that of course. So what do you folks think? Best wishes, -HeinzOn 2/26/19 3:04 PM, John Cowan wrote: If it's not too hard, you might want to extract your changes from your new git repo, drop the repo, use reposurgeon (a general VCS converter and editor), and reapply your changes. That way the history is preserved and you don't need multiple repos.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |