[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New egg: nng
|
From: |
Ariela Wenner |
|
Subject: |
Re: New egg: nng |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:28:10 -0300 |
Honestly, for my usecase, they are about the same.
My main work with nng/zmq is implementing the actor model (I have two
implementations, one for CHICKEN with nng, and a port for Common Lisp with
zmq), so rep/req (and inproc pair for some sync when spawning an actor),
nothing terribly complex.
The main benefit and the reason that I personally like zmq more, is CurveZMQ,
which saves me having to implement encryption with tweetnacl, for example.
Sure, I have the tls transport with nng but that's a bit of a main imo.
El 1 de noviembre de 2021 4:09:06 a. m. GMT-03:00, Arnaud Bailly
<arnaud.oqube@gmail.com> escribió:
><Slightly off-topic>
>I am currently using 0MQ (not in chicken though) and have been looking at
>nng for a while, but unsure how mature it is.
>What's your feedback using it? What are you using it for?
>
>Just curious :)
>
>
--
Ariela Wenner