Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!

[Werner LEMBERG]

>>  Usually, glyph X is, say, the Japanese variant, while X+1 is the
>>  Taiwanese one, etc., etc.
> 
> Argh, I see.  cmap (3,10) have about 400 pairs of unicode points
> maps to the same glyph.  The re-encoding process is likely dropping
> one of them.  It would make sense to duplicate or share a link...

For such an analysis, ttx is your friend.  You can, say, dump the
cmaps of two different TTFs from the TTC and compare the indices.

> I am in the middle of changing stuff in both fontforge and the
> subfont script at the moment. ttf2tfm has a easier task: it just
> needs to point to the right glyph, so sharing a glyph between two
> code points is less an issue, compared to the case with a font
> editor.

Thanks for working on this!


    Werner